|
Person responsible for managing the
assessment (author)
|
Property Services Manager
|
|
Name and brief description of the
service / policy to be assessed
|
Landlord functions for property
|
|
Objectives of the service/policy to be
assessed
|
To ensure that the Council’s land and property
holdings are managed efficiently and effectively in accordance with
the prevailing needs of the Council
|
|
Baseline/monitoring data
|
The Council currently has 214 current property
leases which have been granted in respect of property owned by the
Council
|
|
Service/policy outcome
evaluation
|
No complaints received
|
|
List of main
stakeholders/beneficiaries
|
Businesses and individuals wishing to make use
of HBC property
|
|
How representative is the
‘stakeholder’ list above?
|
No information is collected regarding groups
to which these main stakeholders/beneficiaries belong
|
|
Who benefits from the
service/policy?
|
HBC
Tenants
|
|
In what area are there concerns that
the policy could have a differential impact
|
Race
|
Disability
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain for each of the target equality groups,
but in particular race, disability and gender:
|
|
Areas of concern that the
service/policy could have a differential
impact
|
Race: Although any vacant properties are often
advertised, we may not be reaching all groups who might be
interested in occupying the property
Disability: Although the Council takes care to
comply with the Disability Discrimination Act, some of its
buildings cannot be made accessible at an economic cost. This may
put off some disabled prospective tenants.
No concern regarding Gender, Age, Religious
beliefs or sexual orientation
|
|
Differential impact
|
Most lettings will be to businesses or
voluntary groups rather than individuals so that differential
impact unlikely to be significant
|
|
Reasons for any differential
impact
|
Insufficient publicity regarding available
properties. Lack of funding to remove obstacles to disabled access
from older buildings.
|
|
Are there any barriers to
opportunities or access for some groups?
|
There may be language barriers and physical
barriers for disabled access in some properties. Some funding is
made available through the Council’s capital programme to overcome
problems of physical access.
|
|
Complaints data
|
No complaints have been received in respect of
equality issues.
|
|
Are there disadvantages caused by
discrimination?
|
The Council may not be reaching all potential
tenants with publicity regarding available premises
|
|
Are there opportunities to better
promote service/policy inclusion?
|
The Council has recently started to use
‘Serving You’ and the HBC website to publicise available
property.
|
|
Have you undertaken any
consultation?
|
Not recently. Directory of hard to reach
representatives being prepared (target - October 07) which will be
considered in case it offers opportunities for consultation.
|
|
Consultation outcomes
|
Not applicable
|
|
Assessment conclusion
|
There is a low risk that the Council may not
be reaching all possible tenants with information regarding
available property.
A tenant survey should be considered to
provide data for future assessments.
|
|
Monitoring timetable
|
Because there is perceived only to be a low
risk that there is differential service provision it is considered
that the assessment should be reviewed by 30/12/08 at which time
further consideration will be given to the need for a tenant
survey.
Learning Plan requires that Equalities
training is to be completed by all service partners, staff, and
Members by March 08
Equalities project team are looking at ways of
incorporating Equalities issues into customer surveys -
guidance by November 07.
|
|
|
|
|
Please ensure that you have provided as
much evidence as possible to support the responses you have
given.
|
|
Additional Comments
None
|
|
Signed:
Property Services
Manager
(Completing Officer)
|
|
Signed:
Head of Customer & Support Services
(Head of Service)
|
|
Date: 27 September
2007
|