HISTORIC HERITAGE
All policies are superseded by policies from the Core
Strategy
133. This chapter supplements 'Design' by focusing on the
contribution of the conservation areas and historic buildings to
the character and appearance of the Borough. The following policies
represent the Borough Council's continuing commitment to Historic
Heritage by complementing assessments of the conservation areas,
advice on listed buildings and the funding of repairs and townscape
improvements. The Borough Council seeks to conserve and enhance the
historic character of towns and villages with particular attention
to buildings and areas which are of architectural, historic or
archaeological interest. The Borough has a wealth of buildings of
architectural and historic value and approximately 300 are included
on the Statutory List. Some 60 buildings have also been included on
the Borough Council's List of Buildings of Local Interest. The
Borough Council has also been successful in conserving the
townscape of the conservation areas by ensuring appropriate
development, well-designed buildings, refurbishment, environmental
improvements and traffic management.
134. Although the Borough Council plays a leading role in
conservation it is the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and
Sport who is responsible for the legislative and policy framework,
listing buildings of special architectural and historic interest,
exercising statutory powers for the repair of historic buildings
and the designation of conservation areas. Scheduling ancient
monuments, deciding applications for consent and the funding of
heritage agencies are also within the responsibility of the
Secretary of State. English Heritage provides advice to the
Secretary of State and local authorities in relation to ancient
monuments, historic buildings and conservation areas and makes
grants and loans for conserving heritage. Registers of parks and
gardens of special historic interest are also compiled and English
Heritage sponsors surveys of listed buildings at risk.
CONSERVATION AREAS
135. The conservation areas which have been designated include
the historic cores of Havant and Emsworth, smaller groups of
buildings at Lymbourn Road and North Hayling and the nineteenth
century parkland created for Sir George Staunton and his successor
William Stone. All the conservation areas indicate the Borough's
historical development thus contributing to its appearance and
character.
136.
PPG15: Planning and the
Historic Environment, points out that local authorities have a duty
under Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation
Areas) Act 1990 to review existing designations from time to time
and to consider whether protection should be extended. The Borough
Council will periodically review the conservation areas which are
shown on the Proposals Map and will consider whether extensions and
further designations are justified in order to strengthen the
protection of the setting of existing designations or for
conserving the distinctiveness of local areas.
137. Between 1993 and 1994 each of the conservation areas was
reviewed and where appropriate boundaries were adjusted. The review
has been published as Conservation Areas in Havant which describes
the special architectural and historic interest of each area
against which the Council will judge any proposal for change which
may come forward.
HE1 DEVELOPMENT IN CONSERVATION AREA
Development which would be
detrimental to the character and/or setting of conservation areas
will not be permitted. The special architectural character and
historic interest of each of these conservation areas is described
in 'Conservation Areas in Havant' which will be adopted as
supplementary planning guidance. Where it is considered essential,
the Borough Council will seek to bring developments under planning
control by means of Article 4 directions. Development will not be
permitted if it would lead to levels of traffic, parking, noise or
other environmental problems which would be detrimental to the
character of the conservation area and/or its
setting.
138. Inappropriate development both in
and near conservation areas has damaging effects on their character
and appearance. Individual developments may not be significant in
themselves but cumulatively they could have a major impact. Such
changes include those which result from permitted development
rights. The Borough Council may therefore seek to withdraw these
rights for proscribed types of development. However, it is not just
the development itself which can damage the townscape of
conservation areas. For example, car parking can break up the
historic pattern of development and additional traffic could cause
unacceptable noise, danger and congestion for residents and
businesses.
139. New uses may be the key to the
continued viability and vitality of conservation areas. However,
the incremental loss of a particular type of use may gradually lead
to change in the character of an area. Alterations to buildings, in
order for new uses to be accommodated, may also be unacceptable.
Each proposal would need to be judged on its own merits and the
Borough Council will have regard to the nature and scale of the
development proposed as well as noise and traffic.
Design in Conservation Areas
140. The designation of conservation
areas does not prevent change. In some instances development may be
beneficial particularly in gap sites. The potential for development
should be a stimulus for imaginative, high quality designs and be
seen as an opportunity for enhancement. Attractive new development
can be achieved provided that it respects topography, natural and
historic features, follows the principles of scale, height, massing
and alignment and uses appropriate materials. What is important is
that new buildings should be designed with an understanding of
their context in order that they harmonise with their surroundings
rather than simply imitating earlier styles. It is essential to
show how proposals can be integrated into, and enhance, the
townscape. Therefore, only applications for full planning
permission are considered appropriate. Policy D1 High Quality
Design is also applicable to proposals in conservation areas.
HE2 DEMOLITION IN CONSERVATION
AREAS
Proposals to demolish
buildings in conservation areas will not be permitted unless all of
the following apply:
(i) The building is beyond
reasonable repair.
(ii) Satisfactory efforts
have been made to retain the building in use.
(iii) The replacement
development will not be detrimental to the character or appearance
of the conservation area.
(iv) A contract has been
let for an approved scheme of redevelopment and planning permission
granted.
(v) The structure or
building proposed for demolition makes no material contribution to
the character or appearance of the area.
Where relevant the
following criteria will also be applied:
(vi) The treatment of the
vacant site, where no subsequent redevelopment is proposed, will
not be detrimental to the character and appearance of the
area.
(vii) A programme for
recording the building is approved by the Council and implemented
prior to the demolition.
141. The Borough Council will seek to
retain buildings which make a positive contribution to conservation
areas by adding townscape interest and character. Proposals for
demolition will be judged against the same criteria as listed
buildings as contained in
PPG15 paras 3.16 to 3.19 (see
Policy HE5). Even where the building makes little or no worthwhile
contribution to the townscape, the Borough Council needs to have
full information about the proposals for the site before demolition
can be approved. Where early demolition is inappropriate, because
it would result in an ugly gap site, the Borough Council will
impose conditions so that demolition cannot take place until a
contract for an approved redevelopment scheme has been made.
HE3 SHOPFRONTS, ADVERTISEMENTS AND
SECURITY
SHUTTERS IN CONSERVATION AREAS AND
ON LISTED BUILDINGS
Shopfronts, signs, security
shutters and advertisements will not be permitted where they would
be detrimental to the character of buildings and their
surroundings.
142. The Borough Council is aware that
advertising is essential to commercial activity. Well designed
shopfronts enhance the character of the conservation areas and it
is important that security shutters do not damage their appearance.
Unless carefully designed, new shopfronts can have a detrimental
effect on the appearance of individual buildings and the street as
a whole. Unnecessary and inappropriate signs disfigure buildings
and clutter the streetscene. Some shutters obscure the shopfronts
and the window displays and at night block out light thereby
creating darker streets which appear less safe.
143. In the St Faiths and Emsworth
Conservation Areas design guides have been approved for advertising
and signs and also for shopfront alterations and replacements. The
Council has also approved a design guide relating to roller
shutters. The Town, District and Local Centres Chapter contains
policies (TC14 and TC15) on Shopfronts and Security Shutters.
HE4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS IN
CONSERVATION AREAS
The Borough Council will
continue to identify and implement environmental improvements in
conservation areas as resources permit.
144. For many years the Borough Council
has been proactive in enhancing the historic townscape and has a
continuing commitment to identify and promote further enhancement
schemes in Conservation Areas. Proposals will comprise improvements
to the appearance and attractiveness of public spaces and frontages
including refurbishments, paving, tree and shrub planting,
lighting, street furniture, boundary treatment and signage.
HE5 LISTED BUILDINGS
PRESERVATION OF LISTED BUILDINGS
The Borough Council, when
considering applications for development, will have regard to the
desirability of preserving the character and identity of each
listed building, any group of buildings to which it relates and its
setting.
Buildings of architectural or
historic interest should be preserved unless there are overriding
justifications for demolition.
145. Listed buildings are nationally
important since they are the best of our historic and architectural
heritage and because they are an irreplaceable asset. PPG15 points
out that there should be a general presumption in favour of
preserving listed buildings. The general criteria for considering
listed building consent applications are:
(i) The importance and intrinsic
architectural and historic interest of the building and its rarity,
nationally and locally.
(ii) The design of the building.
(iii) The building's setting and its
contribution to the local scene.
(iv) The extent to which the proposed
works would bring substantial benefits to the community.
These criteria are explained more fully
in paragraphs 3.5 to 3.6 in PPG15.
146. The criteria for considering
proposals for demolition are more fully explained in paragraph 3.19
of
PPG15 and
refer to:
(i) The condition of the building, the
cost of repairing and maintaining it in relation to its importance
and the value derived from its continued use.
(ii) The adequacy of efforts made to
retain the building in use.
(iii) The merits of the alternative
proposals for the site.
147. Applications for listed building
consent and planning permission need to show why the works are
desirable or necessary. Sufficient information should be shown for
the Borough Council to assess the impact of the proposal on the
architectural or historic interest of the building and its setting.
Applications for full planning permission should be made and
accompanied by an application for listed building consent.
Applicants are encouraged to discuss proposals with Council staff
before final applications are submitted.
148. Legislation imposes a number of
restrictions and requirements relating to listed buildings. The
Borough Council has produced a brochure entitled Listed Buildings -
A Guide to Owners which explains these responsibilities. Advice is
also available from Council staff and grants may be available to
meet the additional costs of repair and maintenance.
HE6 CHANGES OF USE TO LISTED BUILDINGS
Planning permission will be
granted for changes of use to listed buildings provided one of the
following apply:
(i) The new use is required to
secure retention, repair and rehabilitation.
(ii) The change would not result
in alterations which would be detrimental to the building's
character.
149. The best way of securing the upkeep
of historic buildings is to ensure that they have a viable use.
While the best use is the one for which the building was originally
designed there may be instances where change is required to secure
its future. In these cases it is important to balance the economic
viability of new uses against the effect of any changes to the
special architectural or historic interest of the building.
Therefore, the aim is to identify the best use which is compatible
with conserving the historic fabric, interior and setting of the
listed building (see Policy HE16: Enabling Development and the
Conservation of Heritage Assets).
HE7 EXTENSIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO LISTED
BUILDINGS
Extensions and alterations
(internal and external) which would adversely affect the
architectural or historic character of a listed building will not
be permitted. The Borough Council will require the recording of
features which would be destroyed by the proposed works for which
consent is being sought.
150. Historic buildings are listed by
the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport under Section 1
of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
There are three grades (I, II* and II) which give an indication of
their relative importance. In addition some buildings are included
on the list of buildings of local interest. (See Policy
HE10).
151. Once a building has been listed, or
is the subject of a building preservation notice, consent is
normally required for demolition, alteration or extension which
would affect its architectural and historic character. It is a
criminal offence to carry out such works without the consent of the
Borough Council. Controls apply to all external and internal works
which would affect the building's special interest. However,
consent is not normally required for repairs unless these involve
alterations.
152. Applicants need to justify why
proposed alterations and extensions are desirable or necessary. The
criteria for deciding applications for consent are:
(i) Importance of the building including
its intrinsic architectural interest and rarity.
(ii) Particular physical characteristics
such as design, layout, plan, materials and location.
(iii) Setting and contribution to the
local scene, for example, where the building forms part of a group,
park, garden, townscape or landscape.
153. The grading of the building is a
material consideration in controlling alterations and development.
However, the statutory controls apply equally to all listed
buildings irrespective of their grading.
154. Listed buildings vary greatly in
the extent to which they can accommodate change without loss to
their character. When considering applications for development and
listed building consent, the Borough Council will be concerned that
features are retained both inside and outside the building.
Detailed guidance is contained in Annex C of
PPG15. Reference should also
be made to the Borough Council's Development Control Advice Note
No.7: Home Extensions Design Guide and the leaflet Listed Buildings
- A Guide to Owners.
155. Most listed buildings have
undergone change and therefore exhibit features which represent
more than one period in the building's history. These changes
reflect the evolution of the building and are part of its
character. Repair is therefore the right approach rather than
replacement by new building but it is rarely acceptable to
'restore' a building to one period in its history.
156. Applications for planning
permission and listed building consent must include drawings and
plans which show the impact of the proposals on features of special
interest. The Borough Council will normally expect an applicant to
submit concurrent and related applications for planning permission,
listed building consent and building regulations consent. The
proposed ways of achieving building and fire regulation
requirements will also need to be made clear before an application
can be determined.
HE8 SETTING OF LISTED
BUILDINGS
Development proposals which
would adversely affect the setting of listed buildings will not be
permitted.
157. The setting of a listed building is
often essential to its character. Much of the building's interest
can be lost if the setting is destroyed or harmed. What constitutes
a setting can vary widely from building to building and should not
be interpreted too narrowly. The setting may be limited to
neighbouring land and buildings but may extend over a wider area.
In an urban street the setting may include a number of other
properties. Where a listed building forms an important visual
element in the street it would probably be right to include all the
streetscene within the setting of the building. A high or bulky
building might also affect the setting of a listed building some
distance away or alter views of a historic skyline.
HE9 HISTORIC PARKS AND GARDENS
Development proposals will not
be permitted which harm the character, appearance, features or
setting of parks or gardens of historic interest.
158. Historic parks and gardens
contribute to the attractiveness and character of the urban
landscape and the countryside while being of value for wildlife.
This policy seeks to safeguard parks and gardens which are examples
of landscape history and design and includes those which are
substantially unaltered as well as the planting and features which
have remained following development. Some parks have been largely
developed such as Purbrook Park and Stakes Hill Lodge. However
relic features which remain should not be swept away since they add
to local distinctiveness. Where open spaces remain they provide the
settings for historic buildings, as at The Manor, South Hayling.
The park at Hollybank House and Wade Court took advantage of views
over Chichester Harbour. Leigh Park, which forms part of the
Staunton Country Park, is the most significant designed landscape
in the Borough and is classified as Grade II* in the Register of
Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in England which has
been compiled by English Heritage.

159. A number of parks and gardens which
are of local importance have been included in the Hampshire
Register of Historic Parks and Gardens which has been published by
the County Council in association with the Hampshire Gardens Trust.
Some of the sites included in this register have been developed
although trees and other features from the former landscapes
remain. Most of the parks and gardens are not accessible to the
public although some, notably Havant Park, are significant public
open spaces. An extract from the Register and Plan HE9 identify the
parks and gardens in the Borough and their location. The list of
parks and gardens will be kept under review and revised on the
basis of historical research.
Extract from the Hampshire register of Historic Parks and
Gardens
|
Site ID
|
Place name
Parish
|
Status
|
Type of Garden/Park
|
Main Period
|
|
1781
|
Bedhampton
|
|
Deer Park
|
Pre 1540
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1646
|
Belmont
|
|
Pre 1810 Park
|
1540-1749
|
| |
Bedhampton (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1645
|
Belmont Castle
|
LBII
|
Garden
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Bedhampton (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1895
|
Bidbury Mead Recreation Ground
|
|
Public Park
|
|
| |
Bedhampton (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1671
|
East Leigh
|
LBII
|
Post 1810 Park
|
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1647
|
Elms, The
|
CA, LBII*
|
Garden
|
1750-1809
|
| |
Bedhampton (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1648
|
Gazebo Garden, The
|
CA, LBII
|
Public Garden
|
1750-1809
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1674
|
Gothic Lodge
|
|
Garden
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Hayling Island (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1650
|
Hall Place
|
CA, LBII
|
Garden
|
1750-1809
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1651
|
Hart Plain House
|
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1841
|
Havant Cemetery
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1652
|
Havant Park
|
|
Public Park
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1672
|
Helmsley House
|
|
Garden
|
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1661
|
Hollybank House
|
LBII
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1810-1869
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1668
|
Keydell House
|
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1657
|
Manor House
|
CA, LBII
|
Garden
|
1810-1869
|
| |
Bedhampton (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1676
|
Manor House
|
LBII
|
Garden
|
1750-1809
|
| |
Hayling Island (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1654
|
Oaklands R.C. School
|
LBII
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1810-1869
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1824
|
Old Mill House
|
CA
|
Garden
|
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1658
|
Old Rectory, The
|
CA, LBII
|
Garden
|
1750-1809
|
| |
Bedhampton (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1655
|
Park Wood
|
SINC
|
Ancient Woodland
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1656
|
Purbrook Park School
|
LBII
|
Pre 1810 Park
|
|
| |
Purbrook (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1659
|
Sandy Dell
|
SINC
|
Ancient Woodland
|
Post war
|
| |
Purbrook (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1673
|
Sinah Warren
|
SINC
|
Garden
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Hayling Island (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1660
|
South Leigh Park
|
LBII
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1810-1869
|
| |
Warblington (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1825
|
St Michael's Convent and Sacred Heart
Church
|
LBII
|
Cemetery Garden
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1662
|
Stakes Hill Lodge
|
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1810-1869
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1653
|
STAUNTON COUNTRY PARK (Leigh Park)
|
EH II*, CA, SINC
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1810-1869
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1663
|
Wade Court
|
AONB, CA, SINC, LBII
|
Post 1810 Park
|
1870-1869
|
| |
Warblington (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1664
|
Warblington Castle
|
AONB, CA, AHBR
|
Deer Park
|
1540-1749
|
| |
Warblington (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1839
|
Warblington Cemetery
|
AONB, CA
|
Cemetery
|
|
| |
Warblington (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1666
|
Warblington House
|
|
Garden
|
|
| |
Warblington (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1665
|
Warblington Lodge
|
|
Garden
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Warblington (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1842
|
Waterlooville Cemetery
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1667
|
Waterlooville Recreation Ground
|
|
Public Park
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1822
|
Wecock Common
|
SINC
|
Ancient Woodland
|
Pre 1540
|
| |
Waterlooville (E)
|
|
|
|
|
1669
|
West Leigh
|
|
Post 1810 Park
|
|
| |
Havant
|
|
|
|
|
1675
|
Westfield House
|
|
Garden
|
1870-1939
|
| |
Hayling Island (E)
|
|
|
|
Key: CA = Conservation Area, EH =
English Heritage Registered Site with grade,
LB = Listed Building with grade, AONB =
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty,
AHBR = Archaeology and Historic
Buildings Record
HE10 BUILDINGS OF LOCAL INTEREST
Planning permission will only be
granted for alterations and/or extensions provided they do not
adversely affect the architectural character of buildings included
in the List of Buildings of Local Interest, or their
settings.
160. There are many buildings which are
not listed because they do not meet the criteria set out in the
Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
However, such buildings can contribute significantly to local
distinctiveness. For this reason the Borough Council has adopted a
list of buildings of local interest. The list includes landmarks
and buildings with architectural merit, historical or cultural
associations, townscape quality and relevance to the historic
development of the Borough. When considering development proposals
the Borough Council will discourage the demolition of these
buildings, have regard to the preservation of their character and
expect their settings to be safeguarded.
HE11 PRESERVATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AND
MONUMENTS OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE
Development that would adversely
affect a Scheduled Ancient Monument or other nationally important
archaeological features, or their settings, will not be
permitted.
161. Archaeological remains are
vulnerable to damage and destruction, those which are protected as
Scheduled Ancient Monuments under the Ancient Monuments and
Archaeological Areas Act 1979 are protected under the provisions of
the policy and their locations are shown on the Proposals
Map.
HE12 PRESERVATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES AND
MONUMENTS OF LOCAL IMPORTANCE
Development that would adversely
affect archaeological sites or features of local importance or
their settings, will not be permitted unless the need for the
development outweighs the need to preserve the site or
feature.
162. There are important sites which are
not scheduled ancient monuments, such as the Wadeway which connects
Langstone to Hayling Island and the Roman Villa at Warblington.
Where development can be justified and damage to the archaeology
can be avoided by modifications to the layout, preservation of the
remains in situ, is preferred. The Council will seek to ensure
satisfactory preservation and protection and, where appropriate,
the interpretation of the remains.
HE13 ARCHAEOLOGICAL
ASSESSMENTS
Applications for development
which are likely to affect archaeological remains should be
accompanied by an assessment of their value, the impact of the
proposals and the opportunities for conservation. Such an expert
assessment will have to be prepared and approved by the Council in
advance of any formal determination of the relevant planning
application.
163. If there are indications that
important archaeological remains exist, an archaeological field
assessment should be carried out. This is necessary to define their
type and extent and therefore provides information which is useful
for identifying the potential for minimising or avoiding
damage.
HE14 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Where the preservation of
archaeological remains is not possible or feasible development
should not begin until an agreed programme of archaeological
investigations and recording has been carried out to an acceptable
professional standard and at the applicant's
expense.
164. Where the destruction of
archaeological remains is justified, detailed information is
required before the remains are lost. Although every effort should
be taken to preserve features of archaeological interest it will
not be practicable, necessary or desirable to retain all these in
situ in development sites. Thorough recording is therefore
essential and this should be based on advice from professional
archaeologists. Developers are expected to take the initiative in
obtaining this advice at an early stage once it is clear that
preservation is not justified for archaeological reasons.
HE15 ROADS WITH SPECIAL CHARACTER
Along the following roads
planning permission will only be granted for development and
improvements which do not adversely affect their special
character:
- London Road, Waterlooville (from Hulbert Road to
Silvester Road, Cowplain)
- Leigh Road, Havant
- Emsworth Road, Havant (from Bellair Road to Warblington
Avenue)
- Hulbert Road, Bedhampton (from Bedhampton Road to
Purbrook Way)
- Hulbert Road (north of Purbrook Way to A3M
junction)
- Sinah Lane, Hayling Island
- Stamford Avenue, Hayling Island
- Staunton Avenue, Hayling Island
- Salterns Lane, Hayling Island
- Hollybank Lane (northern end) and Long Copse Lane,
Emsworth
- New Brighton Road (southern end) and Horndean Road,
Emsworth
- Havant Road, Emsworth
- Warblington Road, Emsworth
- Webb Lane, Hayling Island
- Bacon Lane, Hayling Island
165. These roads have a special
character because of mature trees and shrubs. For example, along
Hulbert Road north of Purbrook Way there is the experience of
passing through a woodland and Horndean Road is an attractive
entrance to Emsworth. Other roads contribute to the character of
the suburban environment. All the roads referred to in this policy
contribute to local distinctiveness and to the Borough's identity
and should be conserved by ensuring that any developments and
improvements are sympathetic to their tree-lined character.
HE16 ENABLING DEVELOPMENT AND THE
CONSERVATION OF HERITAGE ASSETS
Planning permission will not be
granted for development which is intended to secure the
conservation of heritage assets unless all of the following
criteria can be met:
(i) Proposals will not adversely
affect the archaeological, architectural, historic or landscape
value of the asset or its setting.
(ii) The proposal ensures a
coherent approach to managing the asset in the
future.
(iii) The enabling development
will ensure the long-term conservation of the asset and its
continued use for an appropriate purpose.
(iv) The need for enabling
development has arisen entirely from conservation
problems.
(v) Sufficient financial
assistance is not available from other sources.
(vi) It can be demonstrated that
the enabling development is the minimum necessary to achieve the
Borough Council's conservation objectives.
(vii) The impact of the
development is minimised in terms of the proposed uses, layout and
appearance.
(viii) The conservation benefits
outweigh any disbenefits to the community of permitting the
enabling development.
The Borough Council will only
consider full planning applications and may seek an agreement under
Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 to secure
the conservation objectives of the development. Repairs should be
to an agreed standard and the funds required should be available
before the completion of the development.
166. The Borough Council recognises that
the flexible application of planning and transport policies may
assist the retention and upkeep of the historic heritage. However,
proposals should not be viewed by applicants as a means of
circumventing policies which should otherwise be enforced. English
Heritage has become increasingly concerned by the adverse effects
of some developments which have been proposed as a means of
benefiting heritage assets such as archaeological remains, historic
buildings, conservation areas, parks and gardens. This issue is
discussed in Enabling Development and the Conservation of Heritage
Assets (English Heritage, 2001) which contains the full
justification for this policy.
167. Enabling development which harms
the heritage which it is intended to conserve is clearly
ineffective. For example, it is unacceptable for development which
is proposed for financing the repair of a listed building to damage
its setting. The integrity of designed landscapes, for example,
depends on coherent and consistent long-term management which is
based on a clear understanding of the whole and its component
parts. The fragmentation of ownerships can result in deterioration
in the longer term. In some cases the conservation objectives might
be achieved but only at the expense of the viability of alternative
uses, for example by reducing amenity or servicing space. The
enabling development should be related directly to overcoming
specific conservation problems rather than, for example, an owner's
inability to finance repairs. This is not a valid reason for
permitting development and in such circumstances English Heritage
advises that a repairs notice should be considered.
168. Even if repair and conversion costs
will exceed the market value resulting from the optimum viable use,
enabling development will not be permitted unless the applicant can
provide evidence that all sources of financial support have been
fully investigated without success. Enabling development should
only be considered as a last resort. Since the proposal may cause
disbenefits it needs to be scrutinised to ensure that these are
reduced to a minimum while maximising the conservation benefits.
This means evaluating options in relation to the guidance
provided by English Heritage. The uses being proposed and the
design of the development require careful assessment and guidance
is contained elsewhere in the Local Plan mainly in the Design
chapter.