| Borough of Havant - Home | Whats New | Site Map | Search | Help | Complaints | Terms and Conditions | Feedback | Web Accessibility | Skip Nav |
Skip Navigation
Home > Health and Social Care > Accessibility > Access Group > Minutes > Minutes 11 February 2010

 

Disability Access Group Logo

Havant Borough Council

Disability Access Group

Agenda

 

Thursday February 11th 2010, 2pm in Committee Room 1 (first floor) Civic Offices

  

 

1.

Apologies and welcome from the Chair, Cllr Terry Hart

 

 

2.

Minutes of last meeting which can be found at:

Click here to link to the 2009 Quarterly Meetings

 

 
3.

Matters arising

 

 
4.

HBCDAG Action Planning for 2009 – Group Update (VH)

 

 
5.

Havant Public Service Village – community engagement about customer service (Share D’All Hampshire County Council)

 

3.00pm
6.

Date of next meeting and close  

 

4.00pm

                             

If you have any special requirements please contact 02392 446007 caren.ransom@havant.gov.uk

 

 

Access Group Meeting Minutes

11 February 2010

 

1.        Present/Apologies

 

Apologies:

 

Judith Glenister                     (JG)

HBC Access Group

Caren Ransom                    (CR)

HBC

 

Present:

 

Cllr. Terry Hart              (TH)

HBC (chair)

Alicia Samuel                (AS)

HBC (minutes)

Cllr. Faith Ponsonby     (FP)

HBC

Fred Dunford                (FD)

HBCDAG

Val Hartridge                 (VH)

HBCDAG

Val Stanley                    (VS)

HBCDAG

Richard Sturgess         (RS)

Gosport & Fareham Access Officer

Share D’All                   (SD)

HCC (from 3pm, for item 5)

 

 

 

 

2.          Minutes of last meeting (26 November 2009)

 

The minutes were agreed as correct

 

 

3.          Matters Arising

 

Page 3 under matters arising on the last set of minutes – the gap between tables & Chairs and market stalls was looked at by Jeff Crate. The group agreed to keep an eye on the issue especially when the weather improves.

 

The group discussed item 5 on the last meetings agenda (The Waterlooville Sainsbury’s Village Consultation). They have agreed to have public toilets, which will be the only ones in the area; nonetheless they will not be on the ground floor making access a little difficult.

 

They are also considering a 3 hour car parking stay after comments from the public (originally planned for 2 hours).

 

The group discussed the benefits of this (encouraging people to go to the town centre as well).

 

Cllr Ponsonby raised an issue an associate of hers had on Solent Road, they are not very mobile and got a parking ticket but managed to appeal against it and win based on her disability.

 

 

4.          HBCDAG Action Planning for 2010

          Members Update (VH)

 

VH updated the group on a few points on the Action Plan:

 

New easy read leaflets have been developed (the wording has been shortened).

 

The T-shirts are complete – they are white with the HBCDAG logo on one side, (the used them for the recent Critical Incident Day).

 

The name badges are complete – completed by FD (they again were used during the Critical Incident Day).

 

As mentioned they took part in the Critical Incident Day for Schools in January. There were a couple of criticisms which was a part of the Groups feedback to Jackie Jones.

 

After the success of this, the Education Business Partnership ( EBP ) asked the Group to take part in a similar day at the Charter Academy in Portsmouth. VH explained that they have been reluctant to pay travel expenses for this trip.

For previous events CR has agreed to pay travel expenses from the budget however to pay for travel outside the borough seems unfair, especially since with the equipment needed they will need to take 2-3 cars.

The Group agreed with RS who thought that to claim ‘reasonable expenses’ when invited to help at an event outside the borough would be fair.

The Group did not want to set a precedence by expecting the group to travel across Hampshire and perhaps beyond with out being able to claim reasonable travel expenses.

Cllr Hart thought that even though there was no particular budget for the Group through HBC , because the Group promotes HBC through its work it could find some extra funding this way. Cllr Hart went onto suggest a partnership payment scheme with EBP .

Cllr H to discuss budgets with Nigel Smith and look into cross department support for the Group.

 

The Science Fair will now be the 4th March 2010

 

The Waterlooville Police Station Mystery Shop is complete - Gwyneth Fyfield had visited the station (not as a mystery shopper) and got shown around and recently VH visited (as a mystery shopper) and found the public areas were all accessible (with push buttons etc.).

Havant and Hayling Police stations are still outstanding. FD tried to visit Hayling Island’s. He checked their website for opening times and found that it had incorrect information on it, as when he turned up the site was closed. Worse than this, the phone that they have to call for assistance was blocked by cones. When he complained about this they suggested making an appointment which defeats the concept of mystery shopping. FD will try again in the near future.

 

VH informed the Group that they have been invited by Andrew Wheeler to attend a play/fun day on the 27th March 2010 12.00 -15.00 at Staunton Community School. The day is aimed at families and 0-19 year olds but is open to everyone. The Group has been asked to do some kurling or possibly Boccia and have a stand as well.

 

On 28th January 2010, JG went to Winchester. HCC had asked representatives from access groups across the county to help review the roads. Shared areas were discussed at this meeting with a couple of borough/towns having banned them.

 

 

5.      Havant Public Service Village – community engagement    

      about customer service (3pm Share D’All Hampshire County

      Council)

 

SD shared a presentation on the Havant Public Service Village with the group.

 

She asked for the Groups comments and feedback on the different ways that customers can be dealt with.

 

The following was raised and discussed:

 

With the system which means the customer takes a number and waits their turn:

·   Different number sets/ colours or areas to separate – possibility of confusion

·   People often get fed up and leave before their number is called, so it can be difficult to know when your number will be called, (not in order).

·   Limited parking may affect this system

·   Providing an estimate waiting time would be helpful

·   Calling out the persons name and/or details raises security and privacy issues – it was suggested that numbers are used instead of names

 

·   Implications for those with audio and visual impairments

 

·   The group suggested an appointment system (based on specific reasons) for those who can’t stand for periods of time.

 

·   Also having a fast track check in (like some doctors surgeries) was approved by the Group

 

·   The Group agreed that they liked it when a person came out to greet them when they have appointments rather that than an automated system  -but again this may raise security and privacy concerns

 

·   They will have to make sure that there is enough space to manoeuvre around queues. This is often a difficulty in queues that are channelled around in loops.

 

·   If there will be waiting, it was suggested that there be activities, or other distractions for children so that the adults can concentrate on what they came in for. But also to have appropriate seating.

 

·   Further concessions were suggested such as a crèche or refreshments (tea & coffee etc.).

 

·   A request to have informal areas to meet and discuss things in semi privacy (like in the current reception area) was made.

 

·   Parking was discussed – AD confirmed that no final decisions have been made. It is possible that a small area will still be available for short stays similar to now. The group requested that the disabled parking bays be increased or alternatively a drop off point be provided.

 

·   The new technology that is proposed was discussed – the group wanted assurances that they would be machines accessible by those in wheelchairs – including the screen. FD often finds that tilted screens are not always considerate of those in wheelchairs. It is either that they are too difficult to view and/or the touch screen options does not line up when viewed from a different angle/height.

 

·   The Group considered how important it was to invest in technology – more people are more literate with advancing technology and it is second nature to many. Nonetheless face to face interaction should never be ruled out

 

·   RS to email SD details of guidance available on the 'Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled people’ as this will have information on this for the planners

 

·   The group suggested having desks at a level that is accessible by wheelchair users

 

·   Sunlight was also an issue discussed as it could impair the viewing of screens/displays

 

·   RS explained that quality training of staff (disability awareness training) is essential to the success of any service

 

·   It is also important that reception staff have the knowledge available to help/give suitable answers

 

·   The pros of having a cash desk was discussed (the feeling/assurance of the security of the money actually being paid. More so if it has been done electronically). The idea pf having payment cards was proposed.

 

·   Job carving (which is apparently done at PCC and HCC ) was discussed – providing a position for someone with a disability which could make them feel valued.

 

·   Cllr Ponsonby raised a concern over soundproofing. Background noise especially with a café may cause problems. The acoustics will have to be considered in the design.

 

·   As raised at the last meeting the Group discussed concerns over the current transport network. (No direct buses from east to west of the borough, making some journeys excessively long.) The Group suggested community transport or satellite locations, e.g. at local libraries as they are usually in an easily accessible area. SD confirmed that this was being looked into including joining electronic services over a period of time.

 

·   SD informed the Group that the existing meeting rooms (Committee rooms and the Council Chamber) will have improved sound systems.

 

 

6.          AOB

 

The small turn out was noted and the Group thought that this was because the papers were not posted. The Group felt that receiving paper copies rather than electronic reminded everyone when the next meeting was.

 

The group discussed the requirements of Blue Badges and it was noted that they are not always needed because the person is unable to walk certain distances but may be because of the size of parking bays (cant twist to get in or need a lot of space to get out etc.). It was suggested that there are differences in criteria depending on location. RS informed the Group that independent reviewers may be coming in shortly to assess who is awarded with a badge.

 

 

7.          Date of the next meeting and close

 

Thursday 20 May 2010 14.00 -16.00, Civic Offices Committee Room 1